"The Strength to Resist: Media's Imact on Women and Girls"

The Study Guide: Introduction
Acknowledgements

Section 1: Looking Through the Lens of Race
Section 2: Using the Film with Middle and High School Students
Section 3: Using the Film with College Students and Adults
Section 4: The Voices of Girls
Section 5: Additional Essays and Curriculum

-Working With Girls Ages 10-12
-Speak! Using the Voice and Body
-Media Images and their Effects on Asian-American Women
-Marketing “Woman” to Women Online

Section 6: Additional Resources

Cambridge Documentary Films, Inc
P.O. Box 390385
Cambridge, MA 02139-0004
(617) 484-3993 fax-(617) 484-0754
e-mail: mail@cambridgedocumentaryfilms.org
www.cambridgedocumentaryfilms.org

 

The Study Guide Uses of the Film This study guide accompanies the 33 minute documentary "The Strength to Resist." The film looks at the toxic and degrading messages imbedded in the images of girls and women that dominate the media and the risks that these messages pose to both mental and physical health.

The film goes beyond merely analyzing the issues and aims at developing in the viewer critical thinking skills, an ability to resist media manipulation, and a commitment to activism. The video presents the ideas of several leading authorities in the fields of psychology of women and girls, eating disorders, anti-racism, violence against women, and media literacy, all of whom focus on potential long term solutions. The film has been used by schools and colleges, as well as professional and community groups, to look at women’s representation in the media and its impact on gender roles from such perspectives as health, gender studies, sociology, media literacy, psychology, and teacher education.

Study Guide Content

The study guide is designed with two populations in mind: students from middle school through high school, and college students and other adults. Although Section 2 focuses on the 4 The Study Guide adolescent and Section 3 on the adult viewer, you may find ideas, questions and activities in each that can be used with both of these age levels.

 

Section 1— “Looking Through the Lens of Race” by Valerie Batts, Ph.D.

In order to more effectively analyze the implicit messages of contemporary media, Dr. Batts (who is featured in the film) highlights some of the differences between the overt racism of the first half of the 20th century and the “modern racism” of today. This section also includes questions that will help students analyze aspects of institutional racism and oppressive biases in the media, and provides some suggestions for ongoing activism.

Section 2 — “Using the Film with Middle and High School Students” by Linda Mizell This section includes a series of questions and activities developed to help adolescents think critically about the ways in which they are influenced by the images they see every day. It includes activities to support students’ healthy resistance to the media’s narrow definition of what is “good, right and beautiful” in its depiction of body types, relationships and cultural images.

Section 3 — “Using the Film with College Students and Adults” by Gail Dines, Ph.D. In this section, Professor Dines (who is featured in the film) explores in depth the issues she addresses in the film: our image-based culture, the ideology of images, pornography, body image and resistance to media images. Her teaching points and the accompanying activities encourage a complex analysis of the media’s affect on gender relations and violence against women, as well as the influence of corporate consolidation of the media and the drive for profit on the images produced.

Section 4 — “The Voices of Girls” by Jamila Capitman and Briana Deutch
In this section, two teenage girls offer their thoughts on issues such as racism, make-up, weightism and the importance that strong women role models have made to each of them personally in keeping their “voices” at an age when many other girls are losing theirs.

Section 5 -- Additional Essays and Curriculum
We have included (1) a special curriculum designed by media educator, Cheryl Hirshman, for girls 10 to 12 years old, (2) an essay by playwright and director Deborah Lake Fortson about using the voice (as in acting or singing) as an alternative to athletics as a resistance strategy, (3) an essay by psychologist Teresa Mok on images and stereotypes of Asians in the media and (4) a humourous and scathing look by Noy Thrupkaew at online marketing to women.

Section 6 — Additional Resources
A brief listing of additional resources and materials which are available to supplement this guide are included in this section. A more extensive listing, as well as opportunities to comment and share insights are all included online at www.cambridgedocumentaryfilms.org where you can click on the link for "The Strength to Resist"

 

back to table of contents

 

Study Guide Contributors

Valerie Batts, who is featured in the film, is a licensed clinical psychologist and is the Executive Director of VISIONS, Inc., a consulting firm with a focus on cultural diversity, multiculturalism and issues of oppression. Since 1975, Dr. Batts has provided consultation and training nationally and internationally to human service providers, psychotherapists, educators, clergy, and private sector managers in a variety of areas. She has written several articles on modern racism and multicultural organizational change strategies and is the author of Modern Racism: New Melody for the Same Old Tunes.

Linda Mizell is a writer and educational consultant who has worked extensively with schools, colleges, and other organizations on the creation of multicultural, anti-racist institutions. She is the author of Think About Racism (a text for young adult readers) and a number of articles on anti-racist teaching practice. Among her curriculum projects are the award-winning Teacher’s Guide to the PBS series Africans in America and a literature-based language arts curriculum for a Southern urban school district. Mizell is a doctoral candidate at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

Gail Dines, who is featured in the film, is an Associate Professor of Women’s Studies and Sociology at Wheelock College. She is the author of Gender Race and Class in Media and Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality. A staunch advocate for media literacy, Professor Dines lectures across the country about the hidden codes and conventions of advertising and the pervasive themes of violence against women.

Jamila Capitman, who is featured in the film, is an eighth grader at Cambridge Friends School in Cambridge, Massachusetts. She is interested in drama and has acted in several amateur productions in the Cambridge area. Jamila also enjoys soccer, dance and socializing with her friends.

Briana Deutch is also an eighth grader at Cambridge Friends School. She is likes to write, play soccer and hang out with friends. Briana is active in several organizations concerned with issues of social justice.

 

back to table of contents

 

Section 1

Looking Through The Lens of Race
by Valerie Batts, Ph.D.

Why is it important to explicitly name race in a discussion of the impact of the media? Clearly, media images have become the central form of communication for most young people in the United States. Our country is based on the assumption that “White is Right and West is Best.” The media has been a primary carrier of this message. The video, "The Strength to Resist" begins to challenge this assumption, and this discussion of race and racism is an attempt to deepen that challenge.

Talking about race and racism is often difficult for teachers. Many white teachers fear saying or doing “the wrong thing.” Others practice “color blindness” and claim to treat everyone the same — usually the same as other white middle class children — thus ignoring the impact of racism on many of their students’ lives.

Many teachers of color believe racism will always be a factor and that talking about it won’t make any difference. Each of these positions, though understandable, actually keep us from using our power as teachers to get young people to think critically about their world so that they may become advocates for real and lasting social and economic change.

We need a common language to find our voices and empower our students and ourselves. Educators need to understand what talking about these issues brings up for them, personally, before they begin group discussions with other teachers or with students. To assist in this self-understanding, personal reflection questions have been interspersed in italics and blue throughout this article.

 

Racism Defined Many people associate racism with people holding prejudiced ideas or acting toward another person in a prejudiced way. We all have individual biases and prejudices, but racism in the United States goes further than individual acts of bias or meanness. When we talk about racism, we are talking about a system of advantage based on race. It is sometimes defined as “prejudice plus power.” It is the ability of one group — white people — to define what is the “right” way of doing things, what is “normal”, what is “beautiful” or “good” coupled with the power of institutions, organizations, and government to put in place policies, procedures, and practices that give advantage to whites.

 

“Modern Racism”

“Modern racism”, by contrast, uses non-race related reasons for denying equal access to opportunity. “It’s not the blacks, it’s the busing I object to,” is one common refrain. “It’s not that we don’t want to hire people of color, but we need qualified applicants,“ is another.

When my daughter and I were exploring how decisions are made about which models are used in commercials, she was told by advertising agency representatives that the cornrows she was wearing might be seen as “too ethnic.” The underlying assumptions of this opinion are all examples of modern racism.

Internalized Oppression As people of color, we struggle to hold diverse images of ourselves in a country that still communicates through its media that “white is right” and white images are what sell. Against this barrage of white images, we have to remind ourselves to value the normal and natural ways that we look, dress, talk and walk when we are not attempting to assimilate into white culture. This pressure to assimilate and the racism we face when we do not sometimes causes us to devalue these and other expressions of our natural selves — a reaction described as “internalized oppression.” In its modern form, internalized oppression is when people of color, as “targets” of oppression, engage in behaviors and beliefs that undermine ourselves and our community. It is when we seem to collude in our own oppression and it often happens on a level that is quite unconscious. When we choose a white doctor over a doctor from our own cultural group because we think the white doctor is probably more qualified — that is internalized oppression at work. When we lighten our skin or get cosmetic surgery because we believe that our skin or features are not beautiful as they are — again, that is internalized oppression.

Internalized oppression is inevitable, given the intensity of racism, and is first and foremost a “survival strategy”. In the slavery and Jim Crow days, smiling, agreeing with the white man, and acting “simple” meant that you could live another day, both literally and figuratively. It was a functional response to racism. It was self-preservation. It is still difficult to avoid these “traps” of behaving in ways that used to be effective as survival mechanisms, but have now outlived their usefulness. We can bring these behaviors into our awareness and then seek support from others in our community to practice “letting go” of internalized oppression behaviors and find new strategies for getting our needs met in the world.

So what can we do about racism in the media? So what can we do? We educate ourselves. We engage in the dialogue. We come to recognize our biases as well as our buying practices. This includes recognizing the ways in which we have come to accept current media images of beauty as ideal. We need to develop a strategy for confronting racist and “Westernist” images in our personal lives as well as in our families and communities.
We can choose not to purchase materials or products that add to personally unhealthy and economically debilitating outcomes. We can write media executives, advertisers, and government officials to make our positions clear. We can organize to support programs that promote media literacy, both locally and globally. We can object to gender and racial stereotyping wherever it occurs.

And, as we view "The Strength to Resist", we can use the following questions both with our peers and with our students to explore the impact of race on our experience with the media, on our image of ourselves, and on our perceptions of what is “right, good and beautiful” in our culture.

back to table of contents

 

Section 2

Using the Film with Middle and High School Students
by Linda Mizell

The following questions and activities are designed to help adolescents think critically about the ways in which they are influenced by the images they see every day. Activities like these have been used by teachers in middle and high school classrooms in a variety of settings: suburban and urban, public and independent schools, and after school programs. Teachers have used the film in English, social studies, health, journalism, media literacy, and other subject areas.

Most of these questions and activities do not need additional resources in order to complete them; however, we have included references to additional materials and resources which are available on the film’s website link at: www.cambridgedocumentaryfilms.org.

Although you can pick one or two activities to accompany the film if time is very limited, most teachers have found that a minimum of three class sessions seems to be most effective in working with this film as a teaching unit.

back to table of contents

 

Section 3

Using the Film with College Students and Adults
by Gail Dines, Ph.D.

The following curriculum guide expands the topics presented in the film:

• Analysis of Image Based Culture
• Images and Ideology
• Body Image
• Pornography
• Resistance to Media Images

and allows students to actively take their analysis to deeper levels. College instructors can use any or all of these topics with their classes — particularly in media studies, gender studies, women’s studies and sociology — and additional materials and suggested resources can be found on the film’s web site link at: www.cambridgedocumentaryfilms.org.

Educators working with adult groups for a single event or within a very limited timeframe may want to select an area of concentration or choose one question or activity from each area. Section 2, “Questions and Activities for Middle and High School Students” will also have some material that may be appropriate for use.

 

I. Analysis of Image Based Culture

Within media studies, there is a growing discussion on the nature and importance of moving from a print-based culture to an imagebased culture. The main argument here is that the major form of communication today is the image rather than print. Media theorists argue that this shift has brought about changes in the way we think, process and decode information. Annabelle Sreberny-Mohammadi sees the difference between a print-based culture and an image-based culture as one where images “undermine the power of logos, the slow development of rational understanding and analysis, in favor of rapid and fragmented bits of information; instead of abstract conceptual language, it provides vivid, particularistic images, and instead of intellectuals, it creates celebrities.”

Media theorists in that last decade have tended to adopt a more “cultural studies approach” to understanding the way media images construct reality. Rather than talking simply in terms of short-term “effects”, a more psychologically based concept; the discussion now focuses on the long-term ideological effects of living in an image-based culture that is controlled by corporate interests. This kind of analysis necessarily raises questions about how we construct notions of reality from the media and whose reality is actually being portrayed.

One of the main arguments put forward by cultural studies theorists is that the media only tells the stories of a select group of elites and either distorts or renders invisible the lives of minorities. Larry Gross has called this “Symbolic Annihilation” and argues that those without the money and power to own or control the media do not get to have their voices heard in the market place of ideas. (See Section 2: Valerie Batts’ “Looking through the Lens of Race” included in this study guide.)

 

III. Body Image

Studies show that girls and women are extremely dissatisfied with their bodies, often to the point of hating their bodies, as well as themselves. While this is not a new phenomenon, the images of women have become more and more impossible to live up to. Models are thinner today than they have ever been and there are fewer and fewer alternative images in the media. From movie stars to TV anchorwomen, women in the public eye are expected to conform to a narrow standard of beauty, which is achieved through plastic surgery, excessive dieting, exercising and sophisticated air brushing technology.

Given that real women come in multiple shapes and sizes and skin colors, there is a growing rift between the ideal beauty standard and reality. However, as we become a nation of image consumers, the line between media and reality blurs since we take the media to be a representation of real women.

IV. Pornography

This topic is extremely controversial in both academic and non-academic circles. Many students will come to class with strong opinions on both sides and the aim should be to explore the different sides of the debate using a range of readings. The brief discussion in the documentary takes the position that much of pornography is a threat to women’s dignity and their right to be safe in their homes, workplaces and communities. From this framework, pornography is seen as a propaganda tool used by patriarchy to legitimize, condone and celebrate violence against women.

The argument is not that pornography causes individual men to rape women, but rather produces and sustains notions of femininity and masculinity that perpetuate violence against women. The pro-pornography position argues that pornography is a form if sexual fantasy that allows for both women and men to explore their sexuality in a sexually repressed society.

To assume that pornography is just fantasy, however, ignores the economic dimensions of the industry. It is also argued that any attempts to limit pornography will result in the censorship of sexual expression and freedom. Yet those who do not have money, cannot produce their own forms of sexual expression. It is also useful to ask whose image of sex is being depicted, male or female.

 

V. Resistance to Media Images

One of the themes developed in cultural studies is the notion of resistance. Media scholars have explored the concept theoretically in order to discern what resistance actually means. Some theorists argue that consumers do not necessarily decode the images in ways that they were encoded. This has been termed “reading against the grain” whereby individuals bring their own histories, world-views, and experiences to a text which results in them making a range of meanings not necessarily intended by the producers.

Other scholars however, have argued that this “reading against the grain” is a pseudo form of resistance, since it does not change the political and economic context of media production. It is important to keep in mind that texts are polysemic (have multiple meanings) while also acknowledging that texts are encoded within a dominant ideological framework.

Given this debate, it is useful to think of resistance in terms of both individual resistance and organized resistance, which calls for structural changes in the ownership and control of media production and distribution and more access to alternative media.

back to table of contents

 

 

Section 4

 

The Voices of Girls
essays by Jamila Capitman and Briana Deutch

Briana — October 28, 2000

My name is Briana. I am in the 8th grade at Cambridge Friends School. I am 13 years old (almost 14).

It used to be that when someone saw a young girl who was around 5’3" and over 100 pounds, they’d keep living their lives and wouldn’t comment on it. Now, if a girl is the weight she should be, she is criticized by the world. One form of this criticism is teen magazines. They send subliminal (or not so subliminal) messages to young teen girls telling them to live up to the expectations of the society.

The magazines put skinny blonde white girls in their pictures and pretend not to realize that these fake women are what the future women of our world look up to as role models. These “role models” are usually wearing tight, popular, cute clothes that many teen girls either can’t fit into or can’t afford.

When girls realize this, they think of some way to change it, but the only thing they can change is the “fitting into” part. They set to work, making themselves skinnier, and they usually don’t stop. Eating disorders are taking over the world, and teen magazines certainly aren’t helping to stop them.

Teen magazines are also making girls want to be dumb. The models often pose in positions with their finger in their mouth, looking stupid yet innocent. Teen girls already have trouble speaking their minds because they are afraid to look inferior to boys, but the magazines encourage girls to act stupid and just be giggly and shy. When these girls become anorexic or bulimic, they don’t have the courage to speak up to themselves and tell themselves to eat, or to keep their food down.

If a model isn’t looking stupid, she’s looking sexy. Magazines have commercials in them with women lying on the floor, touching their bellies, or something. And they almost always look depressed, but nobody ever notices that because they’re too busy staring at the fake breasts that are popping out of the model’s shirt (if she’s even wearing one.) Of course, girls want to be beautiful, so they go and get implants or surgery and destroy their natural beauty, which can never be recovered; once you have wanted to be different, there is no way you can ever be the same.

If it weren’t for our strong women of the world, we teenagers wouldn’t survive. It has helped me so much to have my mother and sister as role models to me. They look just like a woman should, and they are beautiful. They are opinionated, assertive, and loud, and encourage me to be as well. And I am. These are not the only strong, confident women in my life. I have a whole community of them, and I can’t tell you how much they have helped me. Just like the models in the magazines influence young girls, my role models influence me to be who I am — but in a good way.

In the video, some psychologists said that something happens to girls when they go from being young girls to being young women. They lose some part of them, the loud part and the opinionated part.

I do agree with this idea, but I think that it happens more to girls who don’t have a big community of strong women. I can’t say that it didn’t happen to me at all, but I know it happened less to me than it did to other girls I know, and I think this is because I have a huge community of strong women who I am very close with. In the video, someone said that they “give themselves up” to be liked by others. I think this is true, not only for girls, but for boys too. I think it happens to girls more and it is also more noticeable in girls because they lose their loudness and their opinions and they give themselves up to be liked by others at the same time.

Some of the women in the film said that the way you react to media images is that you lose sight of how you really look. I agree that this is one of the many ways of reaction to media images. You see all these pictures of skinny blonde white girls and then you see all these people who have been affected by that image and have tried to match themselves to the image, and then you lose sight of what women really look like, and what women should look like. You start to think that blonde, skinny and white is the norm because that’s what everyone looks like in the ads. Instead of trying to make everyone see what’s happening, and trying to make everything go back to normal, you make yourself look like everyone else and ignore the lies that are swirling around right in front of your eyes.

I think that when girls say that they don’t want to be fat, they are really saying that they don’t want to grow into their mature bodies. They don’t want to have hips, or a stomach, or big thighs, which is a woman’s mature body, and actually, most people are attracted to it, which is what girls want. They don’t want to grow into their mature bodies because they think they won’t be attractive, when it’s actually the other way around.

Some people might think that the film is too harsh on the cosmetics industry, and that cosmetics are just playful and fun, and don’t send messages to girls to fit a certain image. I think that is definitely not true. Cosmetics commercials are always advertising new things that you can put on quickly and just throw in your bag, things that won’t wear off easily, so that in situations like when you have a meeting, you don’t have to keep re-applying your lipstick or cover-up. You don’t put cosmetics on for fun when you’re going to a serious meeting. Also, if cosmetics commercials weren’t sending a message to young girls to fit a certain image, there wouldn’t only be blonde skinny white girls advertising the products. This is the image that society tells us to fit. Why can’t we just be ourselves?

Changes need to be made in our society, and I think this video can help. Obviously, I, being 5’7" and over 110 pounds, with brown hair, a Jewish nose, big hips and big thighs, am not perfect in the society’s image. But I am perfect in many other peoples’ image, and I am just fine to me.

____________________________________________________________________________________

Jamila — October 28, 2000

My name is Jamila. I am thirteen years old and I go to school in Cambridge. I live in Arlington with my Mom and Dad — my brother is away at school. I like dancing, soccer and music, and I spend a lot of time with my friends. I really enjoyed being in the video with my mother. It gave me a chance to talk about some very important issues and learn about the technical process of making a movie.

After seeing the film I found myself wanting to talk about the role of race in media images. There are by far less black women in the media than white. This is very confusing to young black girls because, unlike the white girls they know, no matter how hard black girls try, they can never become white. Black girls can starve themselves, can straighten their hair and even sometimes lighten their skin but, no matter what, they are still black.

Another part of the race issue is the “exotic look”. In magazines, TV and movies, Asian and Latina and Black women are portrayed to have a sort of unearthly charm. Most often, these women do not really look fully Asian, Latina or Black. Boys that I know have talked about models and singers of color being attractive but they are usually referring to the light skinned, straight haired Black models or the Latina Jennifer Lopez look-a-likes.

Obviously, the push to be skinny is a major factor in the media today. I personally feel that weightism is just as important as racism, sexism and homophobia. The difference is that people can control their weight. This would not be such a problem because there is nothing wrong with being healthy, but when the images that young girls strive to be like are unhealthy it is a problem. The control can turn to chaos, or eating disorders.

I think one of the biggest problems about the push to be skinny is that it is meant to be attractive to men. Not only do women get taught by the fashion magazines, but by men as well. It is really only a few men who choose these standards, not normal men we see on the street. Women are constantly told, get smaller, and men are constantly told that woman should get smaller. They lose sight of what real women’s mature bodies look like and think that these skinny super models are perfect and everyone else is fat.

As teenagers in our world, we want to be cool, we want to have fun and we want to have friends. All the time, everywhere we go, someone is trying to tell us how to do this: “Wear these clothes, listen to this music, be like this.” Media screams these things at us and even if we try not to, we have to hear.

These images, about how to dress and how to act, really limit us. If I do choose to buy these clothes and listen to this music, I am limited in my choices of my appearance and what music I listen to. I am nothing but these clothes and this music. It puts me in a clique of people who dress like me, and because of my “category” I am from a completely different planet then, for instance, a close friend who chooses to dress a different way.

Much of today’s media is targeted to young people. It get us in their trap and makes us fall in love with it. We don’t usually notice how much media images make us hate ourselves. It is not fair for us, as the main consumers, to be given such a narrow perspective of how life for young people is and should be. We accept this version which hurts us and we don’t even notice it is doing us harm. There needs to be a revolution!

Whenever I see an image of a young man hurting a woman or acting tough and “manly,” I feel sad. Not just because women can never be portrayed in charge of themselves like that, but because of what it does to boys my age. Boys grow up thinking this is how they have to be. Not only is it a body image but a whole aura that they have to show.

Black men watch these stereotypes of other black men and think that is how they should look and dress. I personally think that if someone wants to wear baggy jeans, they should be allowed to without being looked at suspiciously, but since this is not the case, young black men need to see positive role models that are not always dressed a certain way. Women need to see men who are different so that men do not feel so concerned about being “manly” enough.

I think that experimenting with clothing and make-up can be a lot of fun for young girls. I love nail polish and make up because I enjoy seeing myself in new ways. I certainly don’t feel as though I need these things to be who I am, or to be beautiful, but I enjoy the decision. I don’t think there is any reason why young people should not be allowed to have make up, just so long as they know they don’t need it.

The girls we see on television are always heavily made up and, if we see them get out of bed in the morning the first thing they do is put on more. Girls think that is beauty, that is how I must be, so I need make up. I certainly go through never leave the house without lip gloss fazes, but when I stop and really ask myself if I want to wear lip gloss for me, or because of the ad I saw on TV some times I put it down and sometimes I don’t.

It is hard to be sure I am being true to myself all the time. I think sometimes, do I try to look nice because I want to? Or is it because I feel I have to? I don’t know how I make the decision about what looking nice is, or whether I do look good or not, but I usually am happy with myself. It is important for girls to explore options, there is more than one way to be.

I think that the strong women in my life have played a very important role in keeping me healthy and confident about myself. Stories of my grandmothers, my mother and my many Aunties — all of these women who are not fashion models, but role models — have shaped my life. I think for a girl to grow up with strong assertive women around her is a wonderful gift. For some young girls it ends up being the gift of a voice in teen years. I love all the strong women in my life for being themselves and loving themselves, and I also am inspired by remembering all the struggles they went through to get where they are now.

 

back to table of contents

 

Section 5

Additional Essays and Curriculum

 

Working with Girls 10-12
by Cheryl Hirshman

(Cheryl Hirshman is an artist, founder and former director
of the New England Children’s Film Festival and a media
literacy teacher in the Lincoln, MA school system)

I would like to share some of my experiences using this video with younger girls in the 10-12 age group. I first want to present some of my ideas about media and children that I have developed after working over 15 years in this field.

Background
As parents and educators we accept the arduous task of helping our children navigate the hills and valleys of childhood, while they strive to become adults. Along the way we attempt to provide them with experiences that they can use to build strong values and find purpose and meaning in their lives.

The challenge is made harder by media imagery and rampant commercialism that rely on and support social stereotypes. No longer are parents, teachers, community and churches alone in providing the fuel for a child’s life journey. Now, more than ever, we find ourselves coparenting with disturbing media messages that predominate our society.

Gender conditioning begins from the moment a child is born. Being male or female pre-determines how society will view and teach them about the meaning of their role in the community. Even before the ink is dry on the birth certificate, marketers have begun to target the newborn with”free” samples and coupons such as his or hers disposable diapers. Male children are most often welcomed into this world with paraphernalia decorated with images that symbolize masculinity: footballs, baseballs, cars, trucks and boats; while female children are given frilly, pastel colored items adorned with flowers and hearts.

The mood is set. Females receive the message that they are supposed to be nurturing, passive, cooperative and emotional, while males are defined as independent, aggressive, assertive, and ambitious. By the time children reach puberty they have been subjected to intense marketing campaigns, woven with themes of racism, sexism, ageism and violence.

According to recent studies, children spend an average of 1,456 hours watching TV in one year, while viewing at least 20,000 commercials during that time. These statistics do not include the number of programscartoons -- sitcoms and made-for-TV movies -- increasingly using product placement in the production. In addition, over the last few years we have seen a greater number of marketing campaigns directed at children via printed materia -- magazines, newspaper ads, billboards, posters and web sites -- more than ever before. Companies that are not only selling products, but also image and lifestyle are pursuing younger and younger children.

In response to this commercial blitz, we must provide children with the tools to become media literate citizens; so that they may fully understand the impact that message laden commercialism has on their well-being.

"The Strength to Resist"
Though "The Strength to Resist,” was initially intended as an educational video for high school and college age students, I was curious to see how the documentary would translate to younger girls between the age of 10-12. Adolescents in this age group are just on the cusp of discovering their place as women in our culture. They are perhaps the most vulnerable when it comes to media messages and gender stereotyping. After discussion with a number of parents and girl-scout troop leaders, I was given permission to screen the video with a group of girl-scouts. They were all suburban, white, middleclass children. There were 13 girls and four adults participating.

 

Screen Video
I recommend that the facilitator stop the video from time to time to discuss some of the issues posed in the film, particularly after the statements by Gail Dines. A discussion will also aid in helping children to understand some of the vocabulary and visual images presented.

Topics for Further Discussion
These topics sprung up during the screening of the video. Most of the students participating did not know anything about them. I believe that studying a brief history of the women’s movement will greatly benefit young girls and allow them to better understand the content of the video.

History of the Women’s Movement
Eating Disorders
Body Image

Post-Screening Discussion Using the “Three R’s of Media Critique: REVIEW, REACT, RESPOND,” conduct a post-screening discussion. REVIEW the video and discuss some of the points that the students found interesting. REACT to the information, by discussing how it felt to see the visuals illustrating the topic and the messages those visuals symbolize. Discuss the various things that make a person who they are: Cultural background (Ethnicity, Race, Religion, Class) Family Community u Peer group u Education u Environment/where you live u Misc. experiences Have a discussion about how others see us. Ask students if they were to walk in a room where they didn’t know anybody, what criteria would they use in order to chose whom to sit next to. Discuss what information we use in judging someone. Discuss peer pressure. The students talked about how they could RESPOND or take action against the companies that promote negative, violent and sexist images of women. We discussed letter writing campaigns, boycotts and teach-ins.

Post Screening Activity A. Cultural Identity Tree The scouts were asked to draw a tree with roots, trunk and leaves. We discussed that the leaves would represent the outside or appearance of a person or group as seen through clothing, body language and verbal language. We further discussed that this is often how we first begin to judge someone. We talked about the symbolism of the trunk, that it would represent a person or groups traditions and customs, giving us yet another layer of understanding about that person or group. We discussed that the roots would represent the philosophy, laws and beliefs of a person or group and that it is in this layer that we begin to really understand where a person or group is coming from, why they have the tradition and customs that they have and why they might dress or behave in a certain manner. They were asked to fill in the tree with information about themselves. B. Readers Theatre Using a provocative ad from a fashion magazine the students were asked to study the picture and write a brief story about the model, answering the following questions: What is the model’s name, and age? Where does she come from? What does she do? Why is she in the place in the photo? What recently happened to her? Is she waiting for someone? Has she been left alone? After the girls completed their descriptions, they were placed in groups of three and were asked to share what they wrote with each other. They were told that they were going to produce a play for “Readers Theatre”. I read them a definition written by theater educator, Marianne Adams, which says, “Readers Theatre is a form of oral interpretation, which uses a variety of written forms, novels, plays, poetry, etc. Two or more actors stand or sit, usually with scripts, and present the text expressively, using gesture and movement. The focus is on the words and making them come to life in the listeners’ mind. The actors’ focus is out towards the audience. The simplicity of the format emphasizes gestures, nuance in language, and the placement of actors as important elements of the performance.” The students were asked to choose elements from each of the three writings in their small group and combine them into one story, creating a script. They were told that they would decide how their joint script would be performed, what words or phrases they wanted to emphasize, what stage directions they wanted and what gestures they wanted to use. After rehearsing a few times, each group performed their piece. The performance was videotaped in order to discuss and critique the content and execution of the pieces. After completion of the performances, we watched the tape and discussed: What worked well? How something might have been more clearly pre sented. Was the process helpful in creating an alternative meaning to the message the ad provoked? Did they create their own message? What did it feel like to give the ad model a voice? If you could, what would you tell the model, or the company?

Comments
The screening and the pre and post activities took three 2-hour sessions. The girls could have continued with this topic for many more sessions. I do think that having prescreening discussions about the topic with this age group is important. It prepares them for the information to follow. I would however, caution facilitators to carefully assess the readiness of the girls in their group before showing the video. Though the subject matter is vital material for all young people to consider, the language of the piece is directed at an adult level and may lose children under the age of 10.

At first, like many of the other adults participating in the screening, I was skeptical that the girls would understand the information in the video. Some of the parents thought that the images would actually frighten the children or stimulate them to want to mimic some of the postures and attitudes portrayed in the ads. We were pleasantly surprised by the in-depth discussion the girls initiated after the screening. Their comments were insightful, intelligent and mature. They discussed color imagery in children’s ads and commercials and were able to clearly articulate their feelings about the images. They were very interested in the use of light skinned black women in the ads and the absence of other women of color. They summarized the messages presented in the ads as telling women to be, “Perfect, pretty, thin and vulnerable.” They talked about their own comfort levels, what they liked to wear and why.

John Dewey, the father of progressive education, believed that successful education should, “help children learn to see what they look at, hear what they listen to, and feel what they touch.” Following those sentiments, if we provide opportunities for young people to become media literate— critical viewers of media—then we are giving them a most useful tool to navigate through life.

back to table of contents

_________________________________________________________________________

SPEAK!
by Deborah Lake Fortson
actor/playwright/ director, Tempest Productions, Inc

How to preserve girls' resilience and energy, their truth-telling, passionate nine, ten, eleven year old voices? To speak with passion in front of people enlarges who a girl is. She takes up more space: her vibrations penetrate the world around her like waves coming off a stone thrown into water. When the listeners are appreciative, they send back waves of vibration and the speaker feels affirmed and psychically large.

Speaking thoughts and feelings aloud to a group can feel great for all of us, parents and children. Physical activity gives most of us a sense of well being and a strong sense of self. So we tell young people to do sports. What if a girl doesn't like sports? Using her voice can be just as satisfying. Speaking and singing are physical activities as well as expressive activities.

Voice training is a physical training just like swimming or running. It increases oxygen supply and builds new muscles. It makes you feel taller, more three-dimensional and more powerful. Where can a young person build and exercise a full voice? A theme of this film and of the work of Carol Gilligan and her associates Normi Noel, Annie Rogers and others, is to give girls safe environments in which to exercise their voices and practice doing it.

1. Debating, Drama and Voice Training. Debating is terrific as a forum where girls and boys can strut their stuff both intellectually and physically, speaking for an audience and being physically on stage.

Putting on a play is a time-honored confidence builder. Creating plays which young people write themselves is an even bigger booster and builder of clear expression.

Training the voice to speak is a physical activity as much as an expressive one. Perhaps schools could have voice training for their acting companies and their debating teams the way they have fitness training for their football teams! Why shouldn't the kids who want to think or speak poetry on their feet have the physical training support that the athletic teams have?

2. Voice, Feeling and Action. But of course, voice is not only physical. It connects thought and feeling to an action with the body, to a vibration made with the body in space. As Carol Gilligan has said, voice is "a powerful psychological instrument and channel, connecting inner and outer worlds."

After a session with a voice trainer, expanding breathing capacity, flexing muscles, a young person can feel more able to speak loudly and effectively, and will tend to say more what she feels, be more sure of her convictions. Sure enough to say them loudly and unexpectedly to a group of people. It is important that training be connected to opportunities for expression. Expression can lead to action on the issues being felt and spoken about!

3. Rehearsal, Role-Playing for Life, with Tempest Productions. An important preparation for speaking is rehearsing. Speaking up in real life a girl can run a greater risk than she does speaking in the environment of a debate or a play. This also requires rehearsal and strategizing as well.

Doing structured role-playing around a theme can help young people get ideas for strategies around situations where usually they have a difficult time breaking their silence.

The theme of silence is a major element in EAT! , a play presented by Tempest Productions, Inc. on the history of a girl and an eating disorder. There are moments in the story when the heroine thinks about speaking up but doesn't. As she gets addicted to her eating problem, she becomes more and more isolated, refusing to speak about it. An important part of her recovery is learning to say what she feels and thinks.

In a workshop Tempest actors conduct after performing EAT! for high school and college audiences, the actors give audience members the opportunity to rewrite scenes to have the heroine speak up. The audience chooses scenes which they would like to change, and the actors replay the scene for them. Then a member of the audience replaces the actor in the scene and speaks new lines, trying to strategize against the oppressive force that originally keeps the heroine silent. They may instead of acting it themelves, feed the actress the lines to say as she re-plays the scene.

This work is based on Forum theater as developed by Augusto Boal.

The experience of speaking out in a role with their own thoughts and feelings is very empowering and exciting for students. The experience for the audience of watching their peer speak up, hearing the part of the silent girl reborn as the part of a girl who talks back and stands up for herself -- is very exciting for everyone, including faculty and counselors. This exercise also points up how difficult it is to develop strategies to speak up and how alert we have to be for opportunities to do so. And it gives young people a chance to practice strategy in a safe enviroment.

4. What about singing? There are numerous chorus opportunities in the lives of students. What about other types of adventurous use of the voice? Singing contests? Song-writing contests? Contests where kids do rap.

Parents need to press for more kinds of singing in schools and find out opportunities for singing outside school. What about singing at home?

5. Can't we have effective expressive Voices in all the arts in our Schools? In fact, all the programs in arts of all kinds- painting, ceramics, sculpture, drawing, as well as dance, theater, and music, and any trade such as electrical work, automobile repair, carpentry, where you learn a skill with your hands, all these activities build confidence and expressiveness and help young people assert their place in the world.

These are also the activities which are increasingly cut from our public school programs.If parents can make school boards realize how important these activites are to helping the adolescent feel whole and empowered, we can restore some of the capacity for education as a "leading out" of the whole person which many schools have had in previous generations. Private schools know the importance of these so-called "extra" subjects, and oftenspend lavish amounts of money on drama, film, sculpture, art, music, because they know how important these activities are in the training of future leaders who are confident and clear in their thought and expression, whatever field they enter.

Let's begin with the adults speaking up in public so our young people can follow suit to enlarge their physical expression, their voices, their lives!

Eds. Note: You can contact Tempest Productions for a performance of Deborah Fortson’s play EAT! at (617) 731-9697.

back to table of contents

_________________________________________________________________________

Media Images and Their Effects on Asian American Women
Teresa Mok, Ph.D.,
Clinical Psychologist Counseling Center, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign

“ The Strength to Resist” does an excellent job of explicating the powerful connections that media images have on our perceptions of ourselves and others. The documentary focuses primarily on the deleterious effects the media can (and often does) have on women, especially in relation to body image and self-esteem. The video also pays attention to cultural and racial messages about beauty and attractiveness, in addition to gender-based messages about appearance.

This is helpful because in many venues, be they social science articles or popular press publications, classifications of gender and race are often treated as dichotomous, independent entities – despite the fact that they are inseparable within individuals. While the documentary deals generally with the impact of media images on women and girls, the specific purpose of this essay is to delineate how issues brought up in the film might particularly apply to Asian American women.

This essay will deal with several related areas. First, some of the mental health research focusing on how Asian American women perceive themselves in terms of physical attractiveness will be presented. Then, specific stereotypes of Asian American women will be discussed. These stereotypes and images will be shown for their contributions both to self-perceptions by Asian American women and perceptions of Asian American women by others. The connections between media images of Asian American women and their profound impact on this group of women will be explored.

Invisible or Exotic
Asian American women are forced to struggle with the consequences of both racism and sexism; although we live in a culture that often views racial differences through a monochromatic black-and-white lens. This can often lead to confusing feelings of being “invisible” racially and culturally in this country. Yet, at the same time, Asian Americans are often seen as foreign, exotic, or “different,” suggesting that, indeed, race and culture do matter and are noticed.

In a country in which supermodel Cindy Crawford is considered “exotic,” Asian American women may feel that the standard of beauty has little room for them. Indeed, recognizing and trying to integrate these differing, seemingly dichotomous messages can be a painful struggle leading to internal conflict and confusion. This conflict can lead to questioning at a fundamental level about self-definition, selfworth, and identity.

The “Model Minority”
One of the most prevalent stereotypes of Asian Americans in general is that of a “model minority,” denoting hard workers, good students, and a group that has little in the way of social problems that affect other minorities. Although there is recognition that this, as with most stereotypes, is limiting, inaccurate, and incapable of capturing the heterogeneity of this diverse Asian American population, the stereotype and its associated characteristics persist today. Not often discussed is one of the corollary assumptions suggested by this stereotype: that Asian Americans might have relatively positive self-concepts and healthy selfperceptions.

Although this may be true in a limited way for some Asian Americans with respect to academic success, psychological research clearly has demonstrated that Asian Americans tend to have poor body image, poor physical selfesteem, and negative self-concept as it relates to physical attractiveness. And although this affects both Asian American men and Asian American women, the focus of this essay will be the ways in which Asian American women are deleteriously affected by media images and stereotyped portrayals.

Negative Self-Image
Although a popular American saying claims that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder,” the incredibly narrow band of what constitutes beauty should give anyone pause to challenge that claim. Asian American women often struggle with feeling that they do not look “all-American,” and that the definition of being “all American” racially excludes them. Psychological research on Asian Americans and physical attractiveness has yielded two primary findings.

First, Asian Americans do not believe that they are physically as attractive as Whites. Secondly, Asian Americans often impart more positive qualities to Whites than to their own racial group. These conclusions should be horrifying and shocking to us as a multicultural and diverse society. They also should silence doubts that race is a potent factor in perceptions of attractiveness and that these messages are internalized to the detriment of individuals and our communities.

Changing Physical Characteristics In terms of specific characteristics that Asian American women cite as the most disliked on their own bodies are the physical features that are tied to race. In other words, the features Asian American women have described as most wishing they could change were those features that tended to differentiate them from Whites.

For example, skin color, as it is for other communities of color, also is a significant determinant of beauty in the Asian American community. Lighter skin is often valued and prized more than darker skin. Eye shape and size is also scrutinized and evaluated, with some Asian American women literally using Scotch tape to create an epicanthic fold on their eyes.

Nose shape and height, cheek shape, and breast size are other characteristics that are often criticized by Asian American women about their own bodies. Often Whites are seen as the “standard” for what constitutes beauty and there is much psychological distress and energy invested in how one can possibly achieve looking as White as possible. Many Asian American women tell stories about pinching their noses so as to attempt to achieve a “less flat” appearance. Others even tell painful stories of attempting to dye their hair blonde or of wearing colored contact lenses to change their appearance. Often some of these women will talk clearly about how they engaged in such behaviors to attempt to mask their own racial phenotype.

Sadly, Asian Americans are the most likely ethnic minority group to pursue cosmetic surgery. Many of the changes sought to be altered surgically attend to the very features described above – and these are changes that are inextricably tied to race. The media is seen as a potent force in bombarding Asian American women with White standards of beauty as a driving factor in seeking plastic surgery. There are even plastic surgeons who specifically target Asian Americans for their procedures in their advertisements. Some claim to be “Asian eye specialists,” while others suggest cheek reduction surgery for Asians who, by virtue of their ethnic background, possess “large amounts of cheek fat.”

We should be outraged by claims like this that so clearly delineate that race has a definite impact on the definition of beauty. Therefore, when assessing or discussing standards of beauty, mental health researchers and media scholars need to make sure their definitions and investigations cover the broad spectrum of issues beyond weight that deal with body image. And in our daily lives, we need to be vigilant of who is being portrayed – and who is not being portrayed – in the media.

Representation Lacking
Indeed, part of what makes the media images of Asian Americans so potent is that the images that do exist are so extremely limited in scope and so often defined by a trite stereotype. Asian American women are often only seen in a handful of roles and parts: kung fu expert (or kung fu expert’s daughter), news anchor, or mail-order bride. Take a moment and consider our current national demographics (of which Asian Americans constitute approximately three to four percent) and racial makeup and diversity within various localities in the U.S.

Then consider some of the popular television shows and advertisements that run currently – many of which are set in a variety of large, urban cities, where there is known to be sizable populations of Asian Americans. Yet Asian Americans are rarely on-screen presences; they are generally neglected or if they are seen at all the are merely “background color” to the actions of Whites. Thus, the relative invisibility of Asian Americans in the media heightens the pressure on any of the few images that do exist.

Dragon Lady or Selfless Woman
In terms of gender- and race-specific stereotypes, Asian American women are often seen in one of two dichotomous images. One of these stereotypes is embodied by an Asian American female character on television currently. Playing a lawyer on a show about lawyers and their professional and personal lives, this woman has been said to represent a “Dragon Lady.” The Dragon Lady is a particular image that entertwines race and gender into a stereotype that connotes an innate mysteriousness and exotic eroticism.

The Dragon Lady is seen as being able to charm and seduce men (often White men), yet is deadly in her intentions. This character in the television show is known for growling at her co-workers and has ensnared her boss with sexual tricks she performs with her long, flowing black hair. Perhaps, one might argue, this Asian American character is simply unusual, as many of the other characters on this particular show are. However, there are so few Asian American women portrayed in the media that this image certainly carries more power than if it were merely a portrayal that Asian American women could weigh and evaluate against many other images. Additionally, this portrayal is a stereotype, and one that is specific to Asian and Asian American women. The other stereotype of Asian American women is one in which they are portrayed as submissive, delicate, and meek, always putting other’s (especially men’s) needs before their own. A classic example of this stereotype is the main Asian female character in the Broadway musical, Miss Saigon. (As a side note, there is often a lack of separation on the part of the public as to the difference between Asians and Asian Americans. This lack of distinction is erroneous but as a result, there is often a blending of images and perceptions, such that Asian Americans are seen as Asian.)

This female character falls in love with a White man, bears his child, and ultimately kills herself so that he and his new White wife can take the child and raise it as their own. Such a “selfless act” should be seen for what it really is: integrally tied to race and gender. After all, a role reversal with a White woman and an Asian man would be seen as ludicrous. Yet that such an image of behavior for Asian women is seen as noble, attractive, or worse yet, perhaps genetically innate is both disgusting and racist.

The connection between submissive, powerless Asian women and sex was mentioned in the documentary by references to the sex trafficking of Asian women. Asian American women are often seen in this manner and the sickening link from submissiveness to bondage and torture was horrifyingly illustrated in the pornographic image of an Asian woman who was shown lynched and hanging from a tree.

Psychological research has shown that when Asian women are portrayed in pornographic material, they are often shown in situations where they are being tortured or abused. Research has demonstrated that the pornography with women of color often varies the content dependent upon race. Thus, Asian women are depicted in wartime scenarios, as prostitutes or sex slaves, often as helpless and passive.

In conclusion, this documentary video calls for all of us to be revolutionary as we challenge media images around us. It calls for us to be critical consumers of what we take in. In addition, broadening our attention to always include cultural messages or implication within media images and portrayals is necessary if we strive to be inclusive and representative of the diversity that truly surrounds us everyday.

back to table of contents

________________________________________________________________________

Marketing "Woman" to Women Online
By Noy Thrupkaew

I just couldn’t do it. I was shuddering at the thought of becoming a member of women.com, one of a rapidly proliferating group of "women’s websites," for the purposes of research for this piece. After spending just a few days surfing women.com and iVillage.com, the only publicly traded websites "made by and for women," I was already worried that I would turn into the endlessly dieting, baby-making, big-rock-wearing, tamale-pie-baking, husband-pampering creature that is "Woman" on many of the mainstream women’s websites.

These websites don’t sell themselves that way, of course. They attract women web surfers with perks like surveys, online sex therapists, tax advisers, and chats with famous folks. It’s sort of fun in a gross and bloated way, like screeching over Angelina and Billy Bob while eating buckets of chocolate chip cookie dough with your girlfriends. But after a while, it’s hard to take. Both women.com and iVillage.com assault the web surfer with immense amounts of feminized goo, from "Pecan Pie: The Southern Specialty," to the helpful "Take some time to make yourself look good!" in an advice column on Making the Transition From Housewife to Employee. It was a little difficult to get to the articles themselves, though, because my attention kept getting diverted by the shrieking ads telling me to subscribe to Cosmo, buy cute shoes, and purchase "solutions for easy living."

I had already exposed myself to this radioactive blast of "marketing for women," so why not go the extra step and become a member? After all, members of women.com and iVillage.com get a range of goodies from free email accounts and live chat to pregnancy calendars, access to online women’s mags, and a "wedding builder." But becoming a member would mean that the websites could declare open season on my email inbox, sending chirpy newsletters, special offers, and heavy-breathing ads for "women’s stuff."

My emailbox is already bursting with DO YOU LIKE HOT SEX?, LOSE 2-14 INCHES IN ONE HOUR!, ACNE CURE & PENNY STOCK PICK!, MAKE $$$$ FOR NO WORK!, so the thought of adding this new twist to what the cybergods already see fit to send me would be too much. "Oh, not only is this person horny, chunky, zitty, and lazy, but she’s a woman! She must be white, straight, and married, with two kids, a dog, and an SUV! She must like to shop! And for woman things! Things for her family! Because women are relational."

This is actually pretty much the logic behind women’s websites. Studies like those published in the past two years by Jupiter Communications, the "worldwide authority on internet commerce," fanned the flames with their predictions that women will be spending $53 billion per year on internet purchases by 2003. Venture capitalists and internet developers jumped on board, launching "women’s websites" as part of a strategy to corner a previously ignored market.

Relationship Marketing
These folks turned to a bit of corporate philosophy called "Relationship Marketing" to peddle their consumer portals. A prime example is this inspirational nugget from Faith Popcorn, trend guru and corporate consultant, who wrote a book on marketing to women entitled EVEolution: "Marketing to women requires not just learning, but unlearning. Marketers will need to create a rich series of connections and bonds rather than episodic consumer collisions."

MLM Talk Online, a resource website for network marketing professionals, exhorted internet developers to cater to women’s "advanced social and people skills. The current rage of `Relationship Marketing' just puts a new label on the tools that women have always used to build their business." Got that?

It seems that women are a whole different species from men--we are relational and love community. This is not an unfamiliar concept to those who have indulged in John Gray’s Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus, or Deborah Tannen’s You Just Don’t Understand to explain away all the difficulties between men and women. (Carol Gilligan may have started it with In a Different Voice, but she was genuinely on to something, and I don’t think she had Gray’s intergalactic sexism in mind when she wrote her book.)

I’m sure some differences between the genders do exist, but as Francine Prose wrote in "A Wasteland of One’s Own," her scathing New York Times Magazine essay on women’s culture and websites, there are probably not as many "as there would be if this were a society in which men and women could casually decide which gender wants to be president this term, and which one wants to take care of the kids and Great-Grandma. Humans are adaptive creatures, and the people who are responsible for the family tend to get interested in family relationships."

But internet developers aren’t so radical, so relationship marketing--"build a relationship with women so they buy things for their relationships"--and "women’s culture" is what we get. They try to trick us with solicitous advice, sympathetic polls ("The hardest part about dieting and weight loss is a. hunger, b. unappetizing food choices, c. eating out, d. getting off the couch, e. all of the above"), helpful suggestions and tips, and wise experts to guide us through our harried lives as wives and mothers. (And no, there’s no room for divorced, unmarried, single parent, young, old, disabled, queer, darker than lily, or poorer than middle here. We are Woman. Resistance is futile.)

But lurking behind all of the handholding are the twin evils of relationship marketing and the co-option of the noble idea of women’s space. It’s much like being invited to dinner at your best friend’s house, only to have her shake you down for all you’re worth once you’re behind closed doors.

There’s something even more insidious behind all the relational talk, however. At Oxygen Media, home to Oprah Winfrey’s magazine, cable-TV network, and website, chairwoman Geraldine Laybourne says women "are pushed and pressured in such amazing ways that they deserve to have a place where they can take a deep breath."

Of course women need their blissful solitude. We rarely get any help with or credit and financial compensation for the work of care and mothering--work that has been demeaned through the centuries as "women’s work in the home." Add to that the work outside the home that many women do and what do you get? That old Calgon-take-meaway commercial, which was all about the incredible wear and tear of an "average" woman’s life. But does this mean that that woman should never get up to fight the larger forces that sent her scuttling to her bathtub in the first place?

Cleaner Homes, Smurfier Lives? Or Something More? If one chooses to buy into this, one can gain a little happiness, I suppose. We can buy the products to make our houses cleaner and more efficient, our families happier, our work lives smoother, our home lives smurfier--ignoring the fact that all this buying will create a cycle of more exhausting work that necessitates another deep breath at the end of it. We can indulge in what I’ll call "My Home-ism"--the belief that if our homes are spotless and full of gadgetry, our work is going well, and our families are perfect, our work as human beings is done. We can also tone, trim, dewrinkle-ize ourselves until we’re perfect. Our worlds can get smaller and smaller, so we never have to think about all those bad things out there--imbalances of power, sexism, racism, homophobia, inequity, and economics -- and we can escape in our pinker than pink cyberworld.

But I’m not sure that will happen, despite all the doom and gloom I felt after examining the marketing strategies behind the sites. Both iVillage.com and women.com have seen their stocks plummet after an initial stratospheric takeoff, even though nearly four million women visit their sites each month. It turns out that not enough of the web surfers actually click on the ad banners that can bring the sites some revenue. This is no surprise to some shoppers, especially the ones who like to get all up in a potential purchase, try it on, frown, fuss, fidget, take it off, leave, and come back and try it on again before buying it and returning it the next day.

But more than that, women are actually building their own communities, real communities--with each other, and not with sponsoring corporations. Take Peg Gray of Maine, for example. As a breast cancer survivor, she felt alone because support groups were an hour’s drive away, according to the Boston Globe. She turned to anonymous iVillage message boards and chat groups. "I lurked for a while, reading things that the ladies were saying to each other, and finally mustered enough courage to post something myself," she said. "The depth of compassion and empathy and the love and concern for others is unequaled. . . . It felt like family from the beginning." She now spends two hours a day on the website as a volunteer discussion leader.

Even the fact that some of the websites might draw women online can be a great thing. Oprah’s Oxygen Media group was especially proactive about getting women online, creating a TV series, "Oprah Goes Online," whereby Her Oprahness and best friend Gayle King go online in twelve sessions. "From email to chats to search engines to home pages, the two women will explore their options and experience firsthand how the Web will change the way women look at money, shopping, education, community, technology and themselves."

Although the priorities of the series are a little messed up -- money andshopping come first, of course -- who’s to say that women won’t feel they can handle the internet more comfortably? That we won’t level that loudly lamented but not-actedupon gender gap in technology even starting from such a capitalistically minded beginning?

We’re already getting some kind of message out, it seems. By logging on, but not buying, by creating our own communities on the "women’s websites" or by making our own sites, we’re saying that we are more and want more from women’s websites than we’re given credit for that we are finding a way to make the internet a place of our own.

back to table of contents

 

Section 6

Additional Resources

" THE STRENGTH TO RESIST" RESOURCES

AUDIOVISUAL

The Body Beautiful (video/film), 23 minutes
Women Make Movies, Inc.
462 Broadway, Suite 500
New York, NY 10013
(212) 925-0606

Ethnic Notions and Color Adjustment (2 videos)
California Newsreel
149 9th Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
www.newsreel.org

The Famine Within (video), 2 hours
Direct Cinema
P.O. Box 10003
Santa Monica, CA 90410
(800) 525-0000

Fat Chance (video)
Bullfrog Films
P.O. Box 149
Oley, PA 19547
(800) 543-3764

Images of Indians (5-30 min episodes)
www.oyate.org

Mirror Mirror (video/film), 17 minutes
Women Make Movies
462 Broadway, Suite 500
New York, NY 10013
(212) 925-0606

No Apologies (video), 30 minutes
Wry Crips Disabled Women’s Reader’s Theatre
P.O. Box 21474
Oakland, CA 94620
(510) 601-5819

Nothing to Lose. A Performance by the Fat Lip Reader’s Theatre (video)
Fat Lip Reader’s Theatre
P.O. 29963
Oakland, CA 94604
(415) 583-1649

Nothing to Lose: Women’s Bodies Image Through Time (video)
Wolfe Video c/o Customer Service
P.O. Box 685195
Austin, TX 78768
(800) 850-5951

Size 10 (film), 20 minutes
Women Make Movies, Inc.
462 Broadway, Suite 500
New York, NY 10013
(212) 925-0606

Skin Trade: Women, Complexion and Caste (videos)
Skin Trading Video Series
89 Walden Street
Cambridge, MA 02140
(617) 354-8657
jhana@msn.com

BOOKS AND LITERATURE

Adolescents / Girls’ Self-Esteem

Abner, Allison, and Linda Villerosa. Finding Our Way: The Teen Girls’ Survival Guide. New York: Harper Collins, 1995.

American Association of University Women. Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging America. Washington, DC: AAUW, 1991.

Cupolo, A., K. Corbette, and V.Lewis. No More Stares: A Role Model Book for Disabled Teenage Girls. Berkeley: Disability Rights Education Fund, 1982.

Dee, Catherine. The Girl’s Guide to Life. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1997.

Douglas, Susan J. Where the Girls are: Growing Up Female with the Mass Media.

Doswell, W.M., et al. (1998) "Self-image and self-esteem in African American preteen girls: Implications for mental health." Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 19: 71-94.

Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

_______. Meeting at the Crossroads: Women’s Psychology and Girl’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.

Gray, Heather and Phillips, Samantha. Real Girl/Real World: Tools for Finding Your True Self. San Francisco, Seal Press.

HUES (Hear Us Emerging Sisters): A young woman’s guide to power and attitude. www.hues.net, 800- HUES-4U2.London: Times Books. 1995.

Johnson, Roberts and Worell, eds. Beyond Appearance: A New Look at Adolescent Girls. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 1999.

Mackoff, Barbara. Growing a Girl: Seven Strategies for Raising a Strong Spirited Daughter.

Odean, Kathleen. Great Books for Girls.

Orenstein, Peggy. Schoolgirls: Young Women, Self-Esteem and the Confidence Gap. New York, NY: Doubleday, 1994.

Pipher, Mary. Reviving Ophelia: Saving the Selves of Adolescent Girls. New York: G.P. Putnams Sons, 1994.

Teen Voices Magazine. P.O. Box 120-027, Boston, MA 02112-0027 (888) 882- TEEN.

 

Body Image / Eating Disorders

Atkins, Dawn. Looking Queer. Binghamton NY: The Haworth Press, Inc., 1998.

Arnold, Georgina. “Coming Home: One Black Woman’s Journey to Health and Fitness.” The Black Woman’s Health Book. ed. Evelyn C. White. 2nd ed. Seattle: Seal Press, 1995.

Atwood, Margaret. The Edible Woman. London: Verago Press, 1989.

Baker, Nancy C. The Beauty Trap: Exploring Woman’s Greatest Obsession. New York: Franklin Watts, 1984.

Banner, Lois. American Beauty. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1983.

Brown, Laura S., and Esther Rothblum, Eds. Overcoming Fear of Fat. Binghamton: Harrington Park Press, 1989.

Brumberg, Joan Jacobs. Fasting Girls: The Surprising History of Anorexia Nervosa. New York, NY: Plume Books, 1989.

Camplin, Jo, ed. Images of Ourselves: Women with Disabilities Talking. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.

Carillo, Ann, et al., eds. No More Stares. Berkeley: Disability Rights and Education Fund, 1982.

Chapkis, Wendy. Beauty Secrets: Women and the Politics of Appearance. Boston: South End Press, 1986.

Chernin, Kim. The Hungry Self: Women, Eating and Identity. London: Virago Press, 1986.

Cooke, Kaz. Real Gorgeous: The Truth about Body and Beauty. New York: W.W. Norton, 1996.

Edison, Laurie T., and Debbie Notkin. Women En Large: Images of Fat Nudes. San Francisco: Books in Focus, 1994.

Edut, Ophira. Body Outlaws: Young Women Write about Body Image and Identity. San Francisco, Seal Press 2000.

Erdman, Cheri K. Nothing to Lose: A Guide to Sane Living in a Larger Body. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1995.

Fat Girl Magazine: 2215-R Market Street 193; San Francisco, CA 94114

Fat!So?: PO Box 423464; San Francisco, CA 94142.

Fraser, Laura. Losing It: America’s Obsession with Weight and the Industry that Feeds on It. New York: Dutton, 1997.

Freedman, Rita. Bodylove: Learning to Like our Looks—and Ourselves. New York: Harper &Row, 1990.

Friedman, Sandy. When girls feel fat: helping girls through adolescence. New York, NY: HarperCollins, 1997.

Friday, Nancy. The Power of Beauty. New York: HarperCollins, 1996.

Frost, Liz. Young Women and the Body: A Feminist Sociology. Palgrave, 2000.

Gilman, Sander L. Making the Body Beautiful: A Cultural History of Aesthetic Surgery. Princeton: Princeton Univeristy Press, 1999.

Healthy Weight Journal: 402 145th Street; Hettinger, ND 58639; (701) 567-2646; Fax: (701) 567-2602

Herron, Carolivia. Nappy Hair. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997.

Heywood, Leslie. Bodymakers: A Cultural Anatomy of Women’s Body Building. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1998.

________. Pretty Good for a Girl: An Athlete’s Story. New York: Free Press, 1998.

Hirschman, Jane, and Carol Munter. When Women Stop Hating Their Bodies. New York: Fawcett Columbine, 1995.

Hutchinson, Marcia G. Transforming Body Image. New York: Crossing Press, 1985.

Kano, Susan. Making Peace with Food: Freeing Yourself from the Diet/Weight Obsession. New York: Harper & Row, 1989.

Kaw, Eugenia. “Medicalization of Racial Features: Asian American Women and Cosmetic Surgery.” In The Politics of Women’s Bodies.

Kinzer, Nora Scott. Put Down and Ripped Off: The American Woman and the Beauty Cult. New York: Crowell, 1977.

Lyons, Pat, and Debby Burgard. Great Shape: The First Fitness Guide for Large Women. Palo Alto: Bull Publishing Co., 1990.

Miedema, Baukje, Janet Stoppard, and Vivienne Anderson, eds. Women’s Bodies/Women’s Lives: Health, Well-Being and Body Image. Toronto Sumach Press 2000.

Millman, Marcia. Such a Pretty Face: Being Fat in America. New York: Berkley Books, 1981.

Modleski, Tania. Loving With a Vengeance: Mass-Produced Fantasies for Women. New York: Routledge, 1984.

Muscio, Inga. Cunt: A Declaration of Independence. San Francisco: Seal Press. Neff, L.J., et al. (1997)

"Black-White differences in body size perceptions and weight management practices among adolescent females." Journal of Adolescent Health, 20: 459-465.

Newman, Leslea. Some Body to Love: A Guide to Loving the Body You Have. Chicago: Third Side Press, 1991.

Panzarino, Connie. The Me in the Mirror. Seattle: Seal Press, 1994.

Polivy, Janet, and Peter Herman. Breaking the Diet Habit. New York: Basic Books,1983.

Pollock, Griselda. “What’s Wrong with ‘Images of Women’?” The Sexual Subject: A Screen Reader in Sexuality. London and New York: Routledge, 1992.

Powell, A. D. and A.S. Kahn. "Racial Differences in Women's Desires to Be Thin." The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 191-195. 1995.

Rodin, Judy. Body Traps: Breaking the Binds that Keep You from Feeling Good about Your Body. New York: William Morrow & Co., 1992.

Sault, Nicole. Many Mirrors: Body Image and Social Relations. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1994.

Schoenfielder, Lisa, and Barb Wieser, eds. Shadow on a Tightrope: Writings by Women about Fat Oppression. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books, 1983.

Seid, Roberta Pollack. Never Too Thin: Why Women Are at War with Their Bodies. New York: Prentice- Hall, 1989.

Steiner-Adair, et al. The Golden Cage: The Enigma of Anorexia Nervosa. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.

Steiner-Adair, et al., eds. Preventing Eating Disorders : A Handbook of Interventions and Special Challenges. 1999.

Stern, Nanci, et al., eds. With the Power of Each Breath: A Disabled Women’s Anthology. Pittsburgh: Cleis Press, 1985.

Thompson, Becky. A Hunger so Wide and so Deep. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.

Tolmach-Lakoff, Robin, et al. Face Value: The Politics of Beauty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.

Villarosa, Linda, Ed. Body & Soul: The Black Women’s Guide to Physical Health and Emotional Well-Being. New York: Harper Perennial, 1994.

Walker, Alice. “Beauty: When the Other Dancer is the Self.” The Black Woman’s Health Book. ed. Evelyn C. White. 2nd ed. Seattle: Seal Press, 1994.

Weitz, Rose. The Politics of Women’s Bodies: Sexuality, Appearance and Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Williamson, L. (1998) "Eating Disorders and the cultural forces behind the drive for thinness: Are African American women really protected?" Social Work in Health Care, 28(1): 61-73.

 

Children’s Literature

Byers, Betsy. The TV Kid. Puffin Books, 1987.

DeBoer, Ron. Caught in the Net. Windmill Press, 2000.

DeBoer, Ron. Racing Through the Times. Windmill Press, 2000.

DeBoer, Ron. Returning Light to the Wind. Windmill Press, 2000.

Hewett, Joan. On Camera: The Story of a Child Actor. Houghton-Mifflin, 1987.

Van Allsburg, Chris. The Wretched Stone. Houghton Mifflin, 1991.

 

Media Literacy
Alvermann, Donna. Popular Culture in the Classroom: Teaching and Researching Critical Media Literacy. International Reading Association; Chicago, Ill.

Brunner, Cornelia. The New Media Literacy Handbook: an Educator’s Guide to Bringing New Media Into the Classroom. Anchor Books,1999.

Considine, David and Haley, Gail. Visual Messages: Integrating Imagery into Instruction. Teacher Ideas Press, 1992.

Cross, Donna Woolfolk. Mediaspeak: How Television Makes Up Your Mind. Mentor, 1983.

Degaetano, Gloria. Screen Smarts: A Family Guide to Media Literacy. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin, 1996.

Degaetano, Gloria. Television and the Lives of Our Children. Train of Thought Publishing, 1994.

Healy, Jane. Endangered Minds: Why Our Children Don’t Think. Simon and Schuster, 1991.

Miller, Mark Crispin. Boxed In: The Culture of TV. Northwestern University Press, 1988.

Rosen, Yohnah Elana. Changing the World Through Media Education. Fulcrum Resources, 1998.

 

Media Representations of Women

Antler, Joyce, Ed. Talking Back: Images of Jewish Women in American Popular Culture. Hanover: University Press of New England, 1998.

Brown, Mary Ellen, ed. Television and Women’s Culture. Sage Publications, 1990.

Dines, Gail, ed. Gender, Race, and Class in Media: A Text Reader. Sage Press, 1994.

Dines, Gail. Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality. Routledge Press, 1997, 2001.

Douglas, Susan. Where the Girls Are: Growing Up Female with the Mass Media. New York: Time Books, 1995.

hooks, bell. Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston: South End Press, 1992.

hooks, bell. Reel to Real: Race, Sex, and Class at the Movies. Boston: South End Press.

Moog, Carol. Are They Selling Her Lips? Advertising and Identity. William Morrow & Co., 1990.

Robertson, Jennifer Ellen. Takarazuka: Sexual Politics and Popular Culture in Modern Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.

 

Popular Culture, Feminist Theory and Criticism

Ang, Ien. Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. New York: Routledge, 1985.

Allen, Robert C. ed. Channels of Discourse, Reassembled: Television and Contemporary Criticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.

Barthel, Diane. Putting on Appearances: Gender and Advertising. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989.

Baumgartner, Jennifer and Amy Richards. Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism and the Future. Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2000.

Brown, Mary Ellen. Ed. Television and Women’s Culture: The Politics of the Popular. London: Sage Publications, 1990.

Brundson, Charlotte, Julie D’Acci and Lynn Spigel. eds. Feminist Television Criticism: A Reader. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Dow, Bonnie J. Prime-Time Feminism: Television, Media Culture and the Women’s Movement since 1970. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996.

Findlen, Barbara (ed.), Listen Up: Voices From the Next Feminist Generation. San Francisco, Seal Press.

Gamman, Lorraine and Margaret Marshment. eds. The Female Gaze: Women as Viewers of Popular Culture. Seattle: Real Comet Press, 1989.

Griffin, Gabriele. ed. Outwrite: Lesbianism and Popular Culture. Boulder, CO: Pluto Press, 1993.

Hamer, Diane and Belinda Budge. eds. The Good, the Bad and the Gorgeous: Popular Culture’s Romance with Lesbianism. New York: New York University Press, 1994.

Haralovich, Mary Beth and Lauren Rabinovitz. eds. Television, History and American Culture: Feminist Critical Essays. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999.

Heide, Margaret J. Television Culture and Women’s Lives: Thirtysomething and the Contradictions of Gender. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1995.

hooks, bell. Feminist Theory from Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press, 1984.

Heywood and Drake (eds.) Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminist. University of Minnesota Press.

Inness, Sherrie A. Tough Girls: Women Warriors and Wonder Women In Popular Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999.

Kaplan, Ann E. Rocking Around the Clock: Music Television, Postmodernism, and Consumer Culture. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, 1988.

Landay, Lori. Madcaps, Screwballs, and Con Women: The Female Trickster in American Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998.

Lewis, Lisa A. "Gender Politics and MTV: Voicing the Difference". Philadelphia: Meyers, Marian. Ed. Mediated Women: Representation in Popular Culture. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 1999.

Postman, Neil. The Disappearance of Childhood. Viking Penguin, Inc., 1982.

Press, Andrea Lee. Women Watching Television: Gender, Class and Generation in the American Television Experience. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1991.

Radway, Janice A. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.

Rapping, Elayne. Media-tions: Forays into the Culture and Gender Wars. Boston: South End Press, 1994.

Raymond, Diane, ed. Sexual Politics and Popular Culture. Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1992.

Richards, Amy and Baumgardner, Jennifer. Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future. 2000.

Rogers, Mary F. Barbie Culture. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1999.

Spigel, Lynn and Denise Mann, eds. Private Screenings: Television and the Female Consumer. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992.

Summer, Nancy. The Making of Young Activists: Bringing Size Awareness to the Classroom. Radiance Winter 45 1996:10-14.

Walters, Suzanna Danuta. Material Girls: Making Sense of Feminist Cultural Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.

Williamson, Judith. Consuming Passions: The Dynamics of Popular Culture. New York: Marion Boyars, 1986.

Wolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women. New York: Doubleday, 1992.

 

Women of Color/Racism in Media

Allen, Paula Gunn. The Sacred Hoop.

Bogle, Donald. Toms, Coons, Mulattoes,Mammies and Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Film. Continuum Publishing Group, 1994.

Castillo, Ana. Massacre of the Dreamers: Essays on Xicanisma. New York: Plume, 1995.

Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought. New York: Routledge, 1991.

Dragon Ladies: Asian American Feminists Breathe Fire. Boston, South End Press.

Giddings, Paula. When and Where I Enter: The Impact of Black Women on Race and Sex in America. New York, Bantam: 1985.

hooks, bell. Killing Rage: Ending Racism. H. Hol and Co., 1995.

Hurtado, Aida. Voicing Chicana Feminisms: Young Women Speak out on Sexuality and Identity. New York: New York university Press, 2001.

James, Joy. Shadowboxing: Representations of Black Feminist Politics.

Maracle, Lee. I am Woman: A Native Perspective on Sociology and Feminism.

Mohanty, Russo and Torres, eds. Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism.

Moraga, Cherrie, and Anzaldua, Gloria, eds. This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. New York: Kitchen Table Press, 1981.

Nicholson, Daniel. “Developing a Media Literacy of Whiteness in Advertising” from White Reign: Deploying Whiteness in America, Kincheloe, Steinberg, Rodriguez, and Shennault, eds., 2000.

Sheftall, Beverly Guy. Words of Fire: an Anthology of African American Feminist Thought. South End Press.

 

COURSE SYLLABI

www.umbc.edu/cwit/syllabi.html

ORGANIZATIONS

Body Image / Eating Disorders / Women’s Health

Body Image Task Force
P.O. Box 934
Santa Cruz, CA 95061
(408)457-4838
datkins@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu

Boston Women’s Health Book Collective
Our Bodies Ourselves
c/o Boston University School of Public Health
Boston, MA
www.bwhc.org

Council on Size and Weight Discrimination
P.O. Box 305
Mt. Marion, NY 12456
(914)678-1209

Eating Disorder Awareness and Prevention (EDAP)
603 Stewart Street, Suite 803
Seattle, WA 98101
(206)382-3587
www.edap.org

Eating Disorder Education Organization
6R20 Edmonton General Hospital
11111 Jasper Avenue
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada T5K 0L6
(780)944-2864
www.edeo.org

The Fat Feminist Caucus of the NAAFA
National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance
P.O. Box 29614
Oakland, CA 94604-9614

Harvard Eating Disorders Center
356 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02116
(617)236-7766
www.hedc.org
info@hedc.org

National Association of Anorexia Nervosa (ANAD)
Box 7
Highland Park, IL 60035
(847)831-3438
www.anad.org
anad20@aol.com

Real Women Project
The Central Exchange - Education Center
1020 Central Avenue
Kansas City, MO 64105
(816)471-7560
realwomenproject@juno.com

Media Literacy About-Face
P.O. Box 77665
San Francisco, CA 94107
(415)436-0212
www.about-face.org

Center for Media Education
518-1511 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20005

The Center for Media Literacy
4727 Wilshire Blvd., #403
Los Angeles, CA 90010
(800) 226-9494
www.medialit.org

Center for Research on the Influences of Television on Children (CRITC)
CRITC, Department of Human Development
4084 Dole Hall
University of Kansas
Lawrence, KS 66045
(913) 864-4646
critc@ukans.edu

Dads and Daughters
P.O. Box 3458
Duluth, MN 55803
(888) 824-DADS
www.dadsanddaughters.org

Just Think Foundation
39 Mesa Street, Suite 106
The Presidio
San Francisco, CA 94129
(415) 561-2900
www.justthink.org
think@justthink.org

Media Literacy Online Program
http://interact.uoregon.edu/medialit/homepage

Media Scope
12711 Ventura Boulevard, Ste. 440
Studio City, CA 91604
(818) 508-2080
www.mediascope.org

Media Watch
P.O. Box 618
Santa Cruz, CA 95061-0618
(800) 631-6355
www.mediawatch.org

Multiculturalism/Anti-Racism

Visions, Inc.
545 Concord Ave. Suite 1
Cambridge, MA 02138
(617) 876-9257

Violence Against Women

Campaign Against Trafficking in Women
University of Rhode Island
Kingston, RI 02881

Family Violence Prevention Fund
383 Rhode Island Street, Suite 304
San Francisco, CA 94103-5133
(415)252-8900

Join Together Online
441 Stuart Street
Boston, MA 02116
(617)437-1500
www.jointogether.org

Women and Girls

GIRLS INC.
120 Wall Street, 3rd floor
New York, NY 10005
(212)509-2000
www.girlsinc.org

G.I.R.L.S.
(Growing Individuals Reacting to Life’s Struggles)
www.gis.net/~adena/girls.htm

Sisterhood Is Global Institute
1200 Atwate, Suite 2
Montreal, Quebec
Canada H32 1X4
(514)846-9366
www.sigi.org

Teen Voices Magazine
c/o Women Express
P.O. Box 120-027
Boston, MA 02112-0027
(888)882-TEEN
www.teenvoices.com

WEBSITES

Show Real People
www.showrealpeople.org

About Face
www.about-face.org

Adbusters
www.adbusters.org

African-American Images in Media www.usc.edu/isd/archives/ethnicstudies/media_stereotypes.html

The Association for Media and Technology in Education in Canada (AMTEC)
www.amtec.ca

www.cybergrrl.com

www.feminist.com (Amy Richards, from the film, is “Ask Amy”)

The Feminist Majority Foundation
www.feminist.org

Gendercide Watch
www.gendercide.org

Girls, Inc.
www.girlsinc.org

Guerilla Girls
www.guerillagirls.com

www.herinteractive.com

Native American Stereotypes

www.usc.edu/ids/archives/ethnicstudies/indian_image_bks.html

Resources for Anti-Violence Networks

www.antiviolence.org

www.smartgirl.org

The Women’s Intercultural Network, Inc.
www.win-cawa.org

 

back to table of contents